NOTE: Please WAIT while the applet below loads. If a security pop-up menu appears in your browser, please choose RUN/ALLOW to let the applet run properly. It is completely safe & can be trusted. If you have the very latest Java on your PC or Apple Mac, and experience problems with the applet loading, please go here for additional information on Java settings that should resolve the issue.
The following result is from Wares (2010): Choose arbitrary points X, Y and Z, respectively on sides BC, CA and AB of ∆ABC. If perpendiculars are dropped from A, B and C to line segments YZ, XZ and XY, respectively, and if U, V and W are the intersections of these perpendiculars as indicated, what do you notice about the corresponding angles of ∆UVW and those of ∆XYZ? What can you conclude about these two triangles?
Reference: Wares, A. (2010). Using dynamic geometry to explore non-traditional theorems. International Journal for Mathematical Education in Science & Technology, 41(3), pp. 351–358.
A theorem by Wares
1) You should've noticed that ∆UVW is similar to ∆XYZ, since corresponding angles are equal. Can you explain why (prove that) the result is true?
2) Can you generalize further? For example: Is it necessary for points X, Y and Z to be on the sides of ABC? Is it necessary to draw perpendiculars to the sides of XYZ? Does the result generalize to a quadrilateral or higher polygons? Think about it for a while, and/or use dynamic geometry software to explore, before going to Further generalizations of the theorem of Wares.
Back to "Dynamic Geometry Sketches"
Back to "Student Explorations"
By Michael de Villiers. Created, 1 April 2014.